Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Why We Fight Essay Example

Why We Fight Essay Example Why We Fight Essay Why We Fight Essay Why We Fight, is a movie that examines the growth of the military industrial complex as well as the reasons that Americans go to war. If asked the question, Why do you fight? most of us would give the same answer, for freedom and to stop terrorism, but Jarecki, the director of Why We Fight, implores to us to dig deeper and introduces us to an America that is quite confused about their identity both at home and abroad. The film suggests that political and corporate interests are at the heart of the Americans post World War Two warmongering. In my opinion`, Why We Fight forces our attention to the true purposes of the American government and to show us that the threat to the USA is from the inside rather than the outside. I think he`s trying to portray the extreme danger to America`s way of life and democracy. Jareckis Why We Fight, takes its inspiration from President Eisenhowers final address to the American nation and warns us that the military-industry complex could outpace the control the republic has over it. Jarecki makes us realise that what Eisenhower described in the 1960`s is far worse today and frankly I agree. As a way to justify my opinion I would like to state some statistics. In 2008, the US spent approximately $12 billion monthly in Iraq, which amounts to approximately $5000 spent every second1. In comparison America does not spend that much on health care or education combined. Thus, I think that the virtues of American democracy and liberty have been overwhelmed by ravenous military spending and the ridiculous profits of military contractors. But, what I really find interesting about Why We Fight is that we see the words, thoughts and deeds of many American`s that have been touched in quite a personal way by the war. For example, one of the film`s most powerful devices is the use of lengthy interviews with people such as a retired New York City Police Officer who lost a son in the attacks of September the eleventh and a couple of bomber pilots who carried out the first air strike over the Iraqis. The bomber pilots fell great pride in their work for starting a war which I think is quite stupid because their pride has overshadowed their natural instincts of sympathy. I felt sorrow for the retiree because he had great pride in his nation but it was shown a cold shoulder by the Bush Administration and I`m sure he felt like a mere puppet rather than a person within the USA. I think that Why We Fight has pulled the curtain a little out of the way between the pillars of the present-day American military strategy and the American public. I realise that the US Foreign policy has been hijacked quite far maybe even too far and America has started her own road towards her downfall. I think the question is: Should the military-industry complex be reigned in or even more importantly can it be reigned in? I think Eisenhower stated the answer almost 50 years ago, it should be compelled and controlled by alert and knowledgeable citizens. But again can it be? I think that we have stop living life for ourselves in this age, and start thinking about the future of the world as a whole. Being a fan of history, I have noticed that great empires from the Roman to the British, apart from their greatness, share one thing in common: they lead to their own downfall. I think that we have to tackle America`s seemingly unstoppable war machine and make them change their tapestry of the past 50 years which compels America to continuously fight enemy after enemy. The first step in the process is the knowledge to citizens about the misallocation of power and I believe that Why We Fight has taken that first step in informing the public. We have to remember to keep persevering in the face of adversity. I think that the solution is simple: We have to prevent the strong from abusing the weak.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Musical Instruments Essays

Musical Instruments Essays Musical Instruments Essay Musical Instruments Essay Name Instructor Course Date Musical Instruments Native American Musical Instruments Music played an important role in the Native American culture. Particularly, musical instruments were valued as an important part of the culture. Musical instruments in the Native American culture can be classified into four groups namely idiophones, membranophones, aerophones and chordophones. The musical instruments include the Seri split-cane clapper, the Choctaw clapping sticks, the marimbas, the Mixtec and Maya turtle shells, the Pueblo basket drums and the log drum or the Teponaztli. The musical instruments played several roles in the Native American culture. One role important role is that musical instruments carried symbolic significance. The names of the instruments mainly reflected the community’s social ideologies while the decorations made on the instruments were mainly used to symbolize spirituality. These two roles played a major role in spiritual rituals and traditional ceremonies. For instance, the Anishnabe water drums had two different sizes. One called the grandfather and the other one little boy to signify the social relationship between the two. The Banaras Gharana in South Asian music The Banaras Gharana is an Asian musical instrument that was designed by the Indian musician Pandit Ram Sahai. It is classified under the Tabla style of playing made up of membraphone percussion instruments. The Banaras Gharana is played by the use of the fingers and the palm in different motions that produce a wide variety of musical sounds. The musical sounds are classified in categories of mnemonic syllables that are known as the Bol. This musical instrument is well known for its powerful sound and it is popularly associated with famous tabla soloists like Pandit Kishan Maharaj, Pundit Samta Prasad and Pandit Shadra Sahai.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Character analysis on hamlet Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Character analysis on hamlet - Essay Example ." (Eliot, p. 32). This essay is a character analysis of Prince Hamlet. In examining Hamlet one of the most pervasive understandings is that his character changes throughout the play. Still, there is a general degree of despondency that is clear from the beginning. Consider Claudius when he asks Hamlet, â€Å"How is it that the clouds still hang on you?† (Act I, scene ii). This statement indicates Hamlet’s general despondency even before he discovers that his father has been murdered. As the play advances Hamlet is revealed to have further character dimensions including great intelligence and wit. Perhaps the most complex consideration in these regards is the extent that Hamlet is truly insane or faking his insanity. In these regards, it appears that in specific circumstances Hamlet has used his intelligence as a means of concealing his true character. One considers his interaction with Polonius as a strong indicator of this perspective. Still, in other instances, such as his violent outbursts, Hamlet appears to be clearly insane. Another central aspect to Hamlet’s character is the nature of his unwillingness to act. While early on in the play Hamlet vows to kill Claudius and avenge his father’s death he perpetually refuses to carry out this action. One insight into Hamlet’s character is the argument that he is subject to Oedipal repression. It’s argued, â€Å"The call of duty to slay his uncle cannot be obeyed because it links itself with the call of his nature to slay his mothers husband, whether this is the first or the second; the latter call is strongly "repressed," and therefore necessarily the former also† (Jones, p. 74). In these regards, Hamlet is motivated out of love for his mother, yet has psychoanalytically repressed this love so is unwilling to kill Claudius. In other instances, Hamlet appears to be motivated out of a general rational desire to determine Claudius